Journal of ELE Praxis

Journal of ELE Praxis, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024, 52-58, https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.555

Publication date: Nov 24, 2024

Views: 1 | Downloads: 1

This paper evaluates the M.Ed. program in English Language Teaching offered by Kathmandu University, School of Education, using the program evaluation model of CIPP developed by Daniel Stuffelbeam in the 1960s. The study was carried out using the qualitative research design. The information was collected via several interviews with four participants who were selected using the purposive sampling method at the researcher's and the participant's convenience. Out of four, two were faculty members teaching any courses in the program, and two were students who had already completed the program. The questions were asked on the context, input, process, and product, the four elements of the CIPP model. The study found that the program has successfully addressed the needs of the stakeholders, the curriculum and contents are directly connected to the predetermined objectives, and the emphasis on studentcentered teaching and learning methodologies with an excessive amalgamation of ITCs are the major findings.

program evaluation M.Ed. ELT CIPP model KUSOED

1. Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at school level: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1180614.pdf
2. Burke, S. G. (2020). Using the CIPP evaluation model to examine a bachelor of science in health systems management program. USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. University of South Florida. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9715&context=etd
3. Gnawali, L. (2020). Embedding digital literacy in the classroom. In C. Tweedale, & J. Staufenberg (Eds.), Developing effective learning in Nepal: Insight into school leadership, teaching methods and curriculum (pp. 90-93). British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org.np/sites/default/files/developing_effective_learning_in _nepal_0.pdf
4. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In S. M. Brito (Ed.), Active learning: Beyond the future (pp. 59-70). IntechOpen.
5. Kathmandu University, School of Education. (2019). Master of education in English language teaching (Brochure). KUSOED.
6. Khawaja, S. (2001). Education evaluation and monitoring concepts and techniques. University of Missouri.
7. Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The CIPP model: Applications in language program evaluation. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1660-1667. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338426159_The_CIPP_Model_Applications _in_Language_Program_Evaluation#fullTextFileContent
8. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971, February 24). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators Atlantic City. New Jersey. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED062385
9. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 280-317). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), The international handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31-62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP evaluation model checklist (2nd ed.). National Science Foundation. https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2014/cippchecklist_mar07.pdf
12. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. Jossey-Bass.
13. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2007). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. The Guilford Press.
14. Warju, W. (2016). Educational program evaluation using the CIPP model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1), 36-42.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.