Journal of ELE Praxis

Journal of ELE Praxis, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024, 1-8, https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.548

Publication date: Nov 14, 2024

Views: 1 | Downloads: 0

In this autoethnographic study, I explore research scholars' emotional and psychological challenges while preparing their dissertations. To gather data, I reflect on my experience supervising three M Phil in English Language Education students at a university in Nepal. These scholars faced difficulties from the initial stages of preparing their dissertation proposals to defend their dissertations and went through a range of experiences, from trauma to satisfaction. To better understand the scholars' perspectives on dissertation writing, I examined McCann and Pearlman's (1990) theory of vicarious trauma, Astin's (1999) theory of person and environment, and Bronfenbrenner's (1979) theory of ecological models of human development. The study revealed that scholars often experience depression and trauma at certain stages of dissertation writing. This study highlights the crucial role of the supervisor, not just in academic matters but also in the mental well-being of scholars. The insights contribute to the discourse on how personal characteristics and environmental factors influence an individual's academic development. It emphasizes the importance of the supervisor's role in understanding scholars' needs and interests to create a suitable research environment for struggling scholars.

supervision dissertation struggling scholars academic trauma

1. Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.
2. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain, & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 37-43). Freeman.
4. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733-768). Sage.
5. McCann, I. L., & Pearlman, L. A. (1990). Vicarious traumatization: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 131-149.
6. Mendez, M. (2013). Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal.
7. Ngujiri, F. W., Hernandez, K.-A. C., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1).
8. Shaw, J. (2020). Vicarious trauma: Understanding the psychological and emotional impact of supporting traumatized individuals. Routledge.
9. van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide, inequality in the information society. Sage.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.