Journal of ELE Praxis

Writing for Specific Audiences: A Comparative Study of Teaching Writing in Nepal and the U.S.
Amar Bahadur Sherma 1 *
More Detail
1 University of Texas at Arlington* Corresponding Author
Original Article

Journal of ELE Praxis, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024, 24-35, https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.551

Publication date: Nov 22, 2024

Views: 1 | Downloads: 0

How to cite this article
APA
In-text citation: (Sherma, 2024)
Reference: Sherma, A. B. (2024). Writing for Specific Audiences: A Comparative Study of Teaching Writing in Nepal and the U.S.. Journal of ELE Praxis, 1(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.551
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Sherma AB. Writing for Specific Audiences: A Comparative Study of Teaching Writing in Nepal and the U.S.. Journal of ELE Praxis. 2024;1(1):24-35. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.551
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Sherma AB. Writing for Specific Audiences: A Comparative Study of Teaching Writing in Nepal and the U.S.. Journal of ELE Praxis. 2024;1(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.551
Chicago
In-text citation: (Sherma, 2024)
Reference: Sherma, Amar Bahadur. "Writing for Specific Audiences: A Comparative Study of Teaching Writing in Nepal and the U.S.". Journal of ELE Praxis 2024 1 no. 1 (2024): 24-35. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.551
Harvard
In-text citation: (Sherma, 2024)
Reference: Sherma, A. B. (2024). Writing for Specific Audiences: A Comparative Study of Teaching Writing in Nepal and the U.S.. Journal of ELE Praxis, 1(1), pp. 24-35. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.551
MLA
In-text citation: (Sherma, 2024)
Reference: Sherma, Amar Bahadur "Writing for Specific Audiences: A Comparative Study of Teaching Writing in Nepal and the U.S.". Journal of ELE Praxis, vol. 1, no. 1, 2024, pp. 24-35. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v1i1.551
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the disparities in teaching writing and evaluation between the United States and Nepal, focusing on the crucial concept of writing for a specific audience. In the U.S., there's an increasing emphasis on the need for students to tailor their writing to cater to distinct audiences. However, the educational system in Nepal primarily values rigid rules and standards over audience-oriented writing. I argue that teaching students to write for specific audiences is paramount for effective communication and underscores the concept of "learning transfer," where knowledge gained should be applicable across different contexts. While U.S. education standards advocate audience-oriented writing, standardized tests often fail to assess this essential skill. I contend that incorporating audience-specific writing assessments in standardized tests can significantly improve writing education. Some data were collected from 15 secondary-level English language teachers in Nepal. Findings demonstrate that instructors are not aware of the practice of teaching writing for a specific purpose. Ultimately, the paper calls for a shift in writing instruction to prioritize adaptability, context, and the intended audience. It underscores that writing is fundamentally about communication and that understanding the specific audience's needs is vital for effective expression, irrespective of geographical and educational system differences.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  1. Beaufort, A. (2012). College writing and beyond: Five years later. Composition Forum, 26.
  2. Cazden, C. B. (1989). The myth of the autonomous text. In D. M. Topping, D. C. Crowell, & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Thinking across cultures: The third international conference on thinking (pp. 109-122). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Cheung, Y. L. (2016). Teaching writing. In W. A. Renandya, & H. P. Widodo (Eds.), English language teaching today: Building a closer link between theory and practice. Springer International.
  4. Council of the Great City Schools. (2015). Student testing in America’s great city schools: An inventory and preliminary analysis. https://www.cgcs.org/cms/lib/ DC00001581/Centricity/Domain/87/Testing%20Report.pdf
  5. Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project. (2011). Framework for success in postsecondary writing. http://wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-postsecondarywriting.pdf
  6. Curriculum Development Center. (2020). Secondary education (Grade 11 & 12) curriculum.
  7. Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41(1), 19-37.
  8. Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Ghimire, B. (2020, July 04). Education ministry plans to revise calendar, curricula for new school year. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/08/04/education-ministry-plans-to-revisecalendar-curricula-for-new-school-year
  10. Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They say/I say: The moves that matter in academic writing. Norton & Co.
  11. Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student’s rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11(1), 43-84.
  12. Hyland, K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal, 56(4), 351358. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351
  13. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. Jossey-Bass.
  14. McCarthey, S. J. (2008). The impact of no child left behind on teachers’ writing instruction. Written Communication, 25(4), 462-505.
  15. McCarthey, S. J., & Woodard, R. (2018). Faithfully following, adapting, or rejecting mandated curriculum: Teachers’ curricular enactments in elementary writing instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 13(1), 56-80.
  16. NCTE. (2016). Professional knowledge for the teaching of writing. http://www2.ncte.org/statement/teaching-writing/
  17. O’Neill, P., Murphy, S., Huot, B., & Williamson, M. M. (2006). What teachers say about different kinds of mandated state writing tests. Journal of Writing Assessment, 2(2), 81-108.
  18. Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.
  19. Olson, D. R. (1981). Writing: The divorce of the author from the text. In B. M. Kroll, & R. Vann (Eds.), Exploring speaking-writing connections and contrasts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  20. Perkins, D., & Salomon, G. (n.d.). Transfer of learning. In T. N. Postlethwaite, & T. Husen (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 425-441). Pergamon.
  21. Poudel, D. (2022). SEE English paper 2078/SEE English paper 2079. LearnNote. https://www.learnnote.com.np/2022/04/see-question-2078.html
  22. Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11-23). Cambridge University Press.
  23. Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced writers. College Composition and Communication, 31(4), 378-388.
  24. Todd, J. C. (2013). Transforming writing/Transforming writers: Threshold concepts in undergraduate academic writing. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 9. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=tlthe
  25. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Public school data file. National center for education statistics, schools and staffing survey. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/ tables/sass0708_035_s1s.asp
  26. Wardle, E. (2013). What is transfer? In R. Malenczyk (Ed.), A Rhetoric for writing program administrators (pp. 143-155). Parlor Press.
  27. Warren, J. E. (2022). Writing without audiences: A comprehensive survey of state-mandated standards and assessments. Teaching Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 11(3), 1-17.
LICENSE