Journal of ELE Praxis

English Language Teachers’ Experience of Implementing Flipped Classroom
Alina Maharjan 1 *
More Detail
1 Kathmandu University School of Education* Corresponding Author
Original Article

Journal of ELE Praxis, Volume 2, Issue , 2025, Article No: , https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v2i1.653

Publication date: Nov 05, 2025

Views: 1 | Downloads: 0

How to cite this article
APA
In-text citation: (Maharjan, 2025)
Reference: Maharjan, A. (2025). English Language Teachers’ Experience of Implementing Flipped Classroom. Journal of ELE Praxis, 2(), . https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v2i1.653
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Maharjan A. English Language Teachers’ Experience of Implementing Flipped Classroom. Journal of ELE Praxis. 2025;2():. https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v2i1.653
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Maharjan A. English Language Teachers’ Experience of Implementing Flipped Classroom. Journal of ELE Praxis. 2025;2(), . https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v2i1.653
Chicago
In-text citation: (Maharjan, 2025)
Reference: Maharjan, Alina. "English Language Teachers’ Experience of Implementing Flipped Classroom". Journal of ELE Praxis 2025 2 no. (2025): . https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v2i1.653
Harvard
In-text citation: (Maharjan, 2025)
Reference: Maharjan, A. (2025). English Language Teachers’ Experience of Implementing Flipped Classroom. Journal of ELE Praxis, 2(), . https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v2i1.653
MLA
In-text citation: (Maharjan, 2025)
Reference: Maharjan, Alina "English Language Teachers’ Experience of Implementing Flipped Classroom". Journal of ELE Praxis, vol. 2, no. , 2025, . https://doi.org/10.51474/elepraxis.v2i1.653
ABSTRACT
The study explores the experiences of four English language teachers in integrating the flipped classroom in a resource-limited context. Within the interpretive paradigm and adopting a narrative research method, the study presents the challenges faced by teachers in preparing educational materials, accessing technology, and dealing with inadequate infrastructure. It also discusses obstacles faced by teachers due to technology and training. The study's findings suggest that more teacher training and development programs focusing on access to technology are needed for the better implementation of the flipped classroom in Nepal. Despite limited access to knowledge, skills, and resources, the study concluded that educators have successfully adapted a flipped classroom model that meets the needs of the local education system, thereby promoting student engagement and active learning.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  1. Abu Bakar, A. H., Zainal Abidin, N. A., Ali, Z., Muhammad Isa, N., & Sahar, N. S. (2018, April). Exploring the use of flipped learning approach in teaching grammar. In Proceeding of the International Academic Conference (iAC 2018), Bayview Beach Resort, Batu Ferringhi, Penang, Malaysia.
  2. Acharya, C. P. (2014). Use of ICT/web tools in ELT in Nepal. Journal of NELTA, 19(1-2), 116.
  3. Ali, R. (2022). Potential of Viber Messenger to foster online social presence among blended learning students. Journal of Educators Online, 19(3).
  4. Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge.
  5. Bas, G. (2010). Effects of multiple intelligences instruction strategy of students' achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 5, 167-180.
  6. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Before you flip, consider this. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 25-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400206
  7. Clandinin, D. J., & Caine, V. (2008). Narrative inquiry. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 542-545). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n275
  8. Clandinin, D. J., & Huber, J. (2002). Narrative inquiry: Toward understanding life's artistry. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2), 161-169.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  10. Dahal, N., Luitel, B. C., & Pant, B. P. (2023). Ensuring higher learning outcomes through elearning: An example of Kathmandu University School of Education, Nepal. In International conferences e-learning and digital learning and sustainability, technology and education (pp. 92-98).
  11. D'Angelo, C. (2018). The impacts of technology integration. In The technology and the curriculum: Summer 2018 (p. 14). University of Ontario Institute of Technology.
  12. Dawadi, S., Simkhada, P., & Giri, R. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the education sector in Nepal: Challenges and coping strategies. Advance. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.12344336.v1
  13. Dede, C. (2014). The role of digital technologies in deeper learning. Jobs for the Future.
  14. Flipped Learning Network. (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P™. http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FLIP_handout_FNL_web.pdf
  15. Galindo-Dominguez, H. (2021). Flipped classroom in the educational system: Trend or effective pedagogical model compared to other methodologies? Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 44-60.
  16. Gogus, A. (2012). Active learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 77-80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_489
  17. Hamad, W. B. (2022). Understanding the foremost challenges in the transition to online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 5(2), 393-410. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1055695
  18. Hamid, S. M., & Fadila, I. (2024). Analysis of the impact of using ChatGPT on student learning motivation. Xalqaro Ilmiy-amaliy Konferensiya, 230-238.
  19. Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. D. M. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129
  20. Kasumi, H., & Xhemaili, M. (2023). Student motivation and learning: The impact of collaborative learning in English as foreign language classes. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 11(2), 301-309.
  21. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  22. Lamsal, H. L. (2022a). Exploring challenges and opportunities of remote teaching at Nepalese community secondary schools during covid-19 pandemic. Utamax: Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 4(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v3i3.8242
  23. Lamsal, H. L. (2022b). Exploring the effectiveness of flipped learning approach in the Nepalese classroom: A descriptive study. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 5(2), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v5i2.5615
  24. Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Suárez, C., Quiroga, S., Sobradiel-Sierra, N., Lozano-Blasco, R., & Rodríguez-Martínez, A. (2020). Flipped classroom model before and during COVID19: Using technology to develop 21st century skills. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0137
  25. Laudari, S., Pradhan, S., & Lama, S. (2021). Remote teaching in Nepalese higher education during COVID-19: Teachers' perspectives. Higher Learning Research Communications, 11(2), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v11i2.1269
  26. Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. (2019). Digital Nepal framework: Unlocking Nepal's growth potential. https://giwmscdnone.gov.np/media/app/public/22/posts/1663132711_92.pdf
  27. Ministry of Education. (2015). National information and communication technology policy, 2015.
  28. Neupane, M. N. D. M. (2025). Technological integration in classrooms: Impact on learning outcomes in Nepal. Shodh Prakashan: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(1), 4051.
  29. Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped classroom approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 8(2), 98-105.
  30. Rana, K., & Rana, K. (2020). ICT integration in teaching and learning activities in higher education: A case study of Nepal's teacher education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 36-47.
  31. Reach & Teach. (2024, March 20). Technology integration in the classroom: Tools and strategies for educators. https://www.reachandteach.net/post/technology-integrationin-the-classroom-tools-and-strategies-for-educators
  32. Scott, S., & Palincsar, A. (2013). Sociocultural theory. In J. Hattie, & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 59-61). Routledge.
  33. Shrestha, D., & Khadka, A. (2022). The role of digital technologies in educational transformation. Digital Data Portal, 1-15.
  34. Subedi, B. S. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of teacher training programs to improve the quality of school education in Nepal. Journal of Training and Development, 1, 9-14.
  35. Venton, B. J., & Pompano, R. R. (2021). Strategies for enhancing remote student engagement through active learning. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 413, 1507-1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03159-0
  36. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
  37. Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of learning and teaching: What do they mean for educators? National Education Association.
  38. Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
  39. Zhen, Z. (2016). The use of multimedia in English teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 14(3), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8080/2016.03.002
LICENSE